Court upholds RM402,000 payout to former HR manager
Only social or community posts, or a single source.
What happened
A three-member Court of Appeal bench unanimously dismissed Tasek Corporation Bhd’s appeal and ordered it to pay RM30,000 in costs. (Reuters pic) PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has upheld a finding that a cement manufacturer’s retrenchment of its former group human resource manager was not a genuine redundancy exercise. (GDELT Global Knowledge Graph, 18:00)
Read the reporting
1 reportCourt upholds RM402,000 payout to former HR manager
A three-member Court of Appeal bench unanimously dismissed Tasek Corporation Bhd’s appeal and ordered it to pay RM30,000 in costs. (Reuters pic) PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has upheld a finding that a cement manufacturer’s retrenchment of its former group human resource manager was not a genuine redundancy exercise.
A three-member bench comprising Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan, Ong Chee Kwan and Radzi Harun unanimously dismissed Tasek Corporation Bhd’s appeal and ordered it to pay RM30,000 in costs.
Delivering the court’s decision, Azizul said the High Court was correct in finding that Tasek had failed to prove that Cha Poh Onn’s position had genuinely become redundant.
Cha was dismissed in 2018 after Tasek claimed his position had become redundant. However, he argued that his HR functions continued to be performed by other employees after his dismissal.
Last year, the High Court ruled that Tasek had failed to prove redundancy and that the retrenchment was mala fide, effectively using it to remove Cha while his duties continued to be carried out.
The High Court allowed Cha’s judicial review application, quashed the Industrial Court’s award, and remitted the matter to the Industrial Court to assess the compensation payable to him.
Following the remittal, the Industrial Court awarded Cha RM402,172.46 in compensation.
Tasek subsequently appealed against the High Court’s decision, but the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of the appeal leaves the findings and compensation award intact.
Tasek may appeal to the Federal Court, subject to obtaining leave.
Neoh Jian Kiat and Daphne Aw represented Tasek while S Raam Kumar and Norleena Jamal appeared for Cha.
Why it is new
- No engagement data available from these sources; score uses mention signals only
Attention graph
Timeline
- DetectedFirst detected (GDELT Global Knowledge Graph) source
Where it started
How it spread
- Step 1News outletsGDELT Global Knowledge Graph18:00
Internet reaction
No social or community posts about this yet from the platforms we ingest.
What we know
- Nothing independently established yet.
What we don’t know
- Independent confirmation is missing; treat specifics as unverified
- Only one source so far
All sources (1)
Attention is measured from these mentions only. Platforms shown: News. We never invent signals for platforms we do not ingest.
Follow for your feed
Follow the topic or the people and places in this story and they shape your For you page. Kept in this browser only.